The Center for Cooperative Research
U:     P:    
Not registered yet? Register here
 
Search
 
Advanced Search


Main Menu
Home 
History Engine Sub-Menu
Timelines 
Entities 
Forum 
Miscellaneous Sub-Menu
Donate 
Links 
End of Main Menu

Volunteers Needed!
Submit a timeline entry
Donate: If you think this site is important, please help us out financially. We need your help!
Email updates
 


Click here to join: Suggest changes to existing data, add new data to the website, or compile your own timeline. More Info >>

 

Profile: Ariel Cohen

 
  

Positions that Ariel Cohen has held:

  • Research Fellow at the Heritage Foundation
  • Contributing editor to the National Review


 

Quotes

 
  

No quotes or excerpts for this entity.


 

Relations

 
  

No related entities for this entity.


 

Ariel Cohen actively participated in the following events:

 
  

July 18, 2001      US confrontation with Iran

       Ariel Cohen of the Heritage Foundation authors a report warning that recent agreements between Russia and China demonstrate that the two countries are “positioning themselves to define the rules under which the United States, the European Union, Iran, and Turkey will be allowed to participate in the strategically important Central Asian region.”
Good Neighborliness, Friendship and Cooperation Treaty - The treaty, signed two days before, includes a commitment to pursue “[j]oint actions to offset a perceived US hegemonism.” Cohen says the treaty “should signal to the Western world that a major geopolitical shift may be taking place in the Eurasian balance of power.”
Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) - Cohen says the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), created on June 14 (see ), and consisting of Russia, China, and the Central Asian States of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, could undermine US influence in Central Asia.
Military partnership - Cohen warns that the two counties are interested in boosting “each other's military potential as well as that of other countries that pursue anti-American foreign policies.” They could encourage the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in order to “force the United States to spread its resources thinly to deal with evolving crises in different regions simultaneously.”
Russian and Chinese economic cooperation - There are “numerous projects for developing free economic zones along the Chinese-Russian border and an international port in the mouth of the Tumannaya river (Tumangan)...,.” The Russian and Chinese also plan to “cooperate in developing a network of railroads and pipelines in Central Asia, building a pan-Asian transportation corridor (the Silk Road) from the Far East to Europe and the Middle East.”
Cohen's conclusion - Cohen urges US policy makers to “examine the changing geostrategic reality and take steps to ensure that US security and national interests are not at risk.” [Heritage Foundation, 7/18/2001]
People and organizations involved: Ariel Cohen, Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
          

September 25, 2002      Events Leading to Iraq Invasion

       In a paper titled, “The Road to Economic Prosperity for a Post-Saddam Iraq,” which is a part of the study, A Future of a Post-Saddam Iraq: A Blueprint for American Involvement, Ariel Cohen and Gerald P. O'Driscoll, argue for the implementation of neoliberal reforms including the privatization of Iraq's major industries. The document says that poverty in Iraq is a result of Saddam Hussein's mismanagement, namely Saddam's decision to nationalize certain industries; Iraq's war with Iran; the invasion of Kuwait; and Saddam's refusal to comply with the requirements for the suspension of UN sanctions. The paper's proposal for jumpstarting Iraq's economy focuses on privatization of Iraq's industries and several other neoliberal reforms. To complement this, the authors recommend using the “media and the educational system to explain the benefits of privatization and the changes to come in order to ensure broad public support.” The costs of reconstruction, they suggest, could be paid for with funds generated from the sale of Iraq's oil. “Iraq's vast oil reserves are more than ample to provide the funds needed to rebuild and boost economic growth,” the report says. [Observer, 11/3/02 Sources: The Road to Economic Prosperity for a Post-Saddam Iraq. Backgrounder #1594] But in order to generate this amount, the Cohen and Driscoll write, the post-Saddam government would probably have to reconsider its membership in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) . “Following the demise of Saddam Hussein, it is unlikely that the Saudi kingdom would transfer a fraction of its production quota under the [OPEC] regime to Iraq to compensate for those lost profits and facilitate its rebuilding,” the authors note. “Iraq will need to ensure cash flow for reconstruction regardless of OPEC supply limitations. Combined with the potential privatization of the oil industry, such measures could provide incentive for Iraq to leave the OPEC cartel down the road, which would have long term, positive implications for global oil supply. ... An Iraq outside of OPEC would find available from its oil trade an ample cash flow for the country's rehabilitation.” [Sources: The Road to Economic Prosperity for a Post-Saddam Iraq. Backgrounder #1594] Cohen will later admit in an interview after the invasion of Iraq that his interest in Iraq withdrawing from OPEC was to destabilize Saudi Arabia (see (Early 2005)).
People and organizations involved: Gerald P. O'Driscoll, Ariel Cohen  Additional Info 
          

March 5, 2003      Events Leading to Iraq Invasion

       Ariel Cohen and Gerald P. O'Driscoll update their September 2002 paper titled, “The Road to Economic Prosperity for a Post-Saddam Iraq,” (see September 25, 2002) expanding the section which addresses plans for post-Saddam Iraq's oil industry. The update is apparently a reaction to the State Department's opposition to the neoconservatives' proposal to sell off Iraq's oil fields. They say that despite Secretary of State Colin Powell's remarks that the “oil of Iraq belongs to the Iraqi people.... [and] will not be exploited for the United States' own purpose....” the US should still provide “guidance to the future government of Iraq on establishing sound economic and trade policies to stimulate growth and recovery.” [Sources: The Road to Economic Prosperity for a Post-Saddam Iraq. Backgrounder #1633]
People and organizations involved: Gerald P. O'Driscoll, Ariel Cohen, Colin Powell
          

(Early 2005)      Events Leading to Iraq Invasion

       Ariel Cohen, who co-authored a September 2002 paper (see September 25, 2002) recommending the privatization of Iraq's oil industry, explains to reporter Greg Palast how his privatization plan would have ended OPEC's control over oil prices. He says that if Iraq's fields had been sold off, competing companies would have quickly increased the production of their individual patches, resulting in over production which would have flooded world oil markets, thrown OPEC into panic, and destabilized the Saudi monarchy. [Democracy Now!, 3/21/05; BBC Newsnight, 3/17/05; Harpers Magazine, 4/05, pp 75]
People and organizations involved: Ariel Cohen
          

Except where otherwise noted, the textual content of each timeline is licensed under the Creative Commons License below:

Creative Commons License Home |  About this Site |  Development |  Donate |  Contact Us
Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use